Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Eric, > >> Like so. Bruno, okay to apply? > > Thanks for the analysis. The patch is nearly perfect. Only the change of the > 'precision' variable from 6 to 0 comes a bit too late: by this time, its > value 6 has already been used for computing the size of a memory allocation. > (I.e. it would allocates more memory than necessary.) I prefer this, and > have committed this. (Btw, yes, gmane applied line breaking to your patch.)
It works for me now, thanks for debugging and fixing it! /Simon
