Jim Meyering wrote: > Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Eric Blake wrote: >>> According to Jim Meyering on 9/16/2008 3:58 AM: >>>> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> I discovered that Solaris 11's /bin/sh exhibits the following >>>>> surprising behavior: >>>>> >>>>> $ /bin/sh -c 'umask 22; (umask 0); umask' >>>>> 0000 >>> We should also document this in the autoconf manual. >>> >> Has it been reported? Seems like the kind of thing that could be fixed >> before Solaris 11 is released. >> >> http://defect.opensolaris.org/ > > Thanks for the link. I've just filed a report: > > http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3450
Ugh, I should have tried it before telling you to report it: % uname -a SunOS XXXXXXXXXX 5.11 snv_91 i86pc i386 i86pc % /bin/sh -c 'umask 22; (umask 0); umask' 0022 Looks like this bug is already fixed somewhere between builds 86 and 91. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com
