Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since the patch I posted does not change the semantics of base_name or > dir_name, I propose to push it now, and those who want different names > or changed semantics can build on top of that. Besides, that patch is > already larger than I would like. > > Objections or reservations? Speak soon.
No objections here. (It's certainly less-disruptive than my proposal....)
