Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> The `strftime' module doesn't provide `strftime ()' as one would
>> expect but instead provides `nstrftime ()'
>
> That doesn't make much sense to me.  IMHO, the 'strftime' module should
> provide a 'strftime' function.
>
> Where is 'nstrftime' defined as a GNU extension, btw?  I can't find it
> in the glibc manual.

nstrftime is not in glibc.
It's been in use (at least in coreutils) since GNU date started
supporting the %N format in 2002.


Reply via email to