Eric Blake wrote:
> | Maybe the Autoconf manual should contain: please don't put /usr/ucb
> | nor '.' in $PATH, and if you must, put it as late as possible.
> | Dunno, I don't have a strong opinion on all of this.
>
> Yes, we could add that, but it won't help the fact that configure is run
> by people who do not install autoconf, and so are not aware of the
> problems in doing so.
You're right. This doc belongs in the INSTALL file, because this is what
people installing GNU packages are supposed to read.
A proposed wording, to be added to the section "Particular Systems", is:
On Solaris, don't put @code{/usr/ucb} early in your PATH. @code{/usr/ucb}
contains several dysfunctional programs; working variants of these programs
are available in @code{/usr/bin}. So, if you need @code{/usr/ucb} in your
PATH, put it @emph{after} @code{/usr/bin}.
The section "Particular Systems" is introduced by the proposed patch in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2008-04/msg00050.html
Bruno
