Hello,
Bruce Merry wrote:
> In lib/lock.h, there is stub code to allow compilation event when no
> threading is supported, but it is missing the various destroy functions.
>
> Patch is attached following the existing conventions.
Thank you. Applied with this ChangeLog entry:
2008-04-17 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lib/lock.h (gl_lock_destroy, gl_rwlock_destroy,
gl_recursive_lock_destroy): Provide no-op definitions for the dummy
implementation.
Patch by Bruce Merry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> I think, though,that at least some of the stubs ought to expand to
> "((void) 0)" rather than nothing.
Yes, in theory you are right... But since this dummy fallback case is not
used normally, it doesn't make much of a difference. Those who care about gcc
warnings mostly develop on systems with POSIX threads.
Bruno
