Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... >> Therefore, I'm asking for opinions - should I apply this patch as is, to > > Seems fine that you've applied it, except for a new failure > in coreutils' running of the gnulib strtod test. E.g.,
The buildbot is also showing a new compile failure: http://buildbot.proulx.com:9000/ cc1: warnings being treated as errors strtod.c: In function 'rpl_strtod': strtod.c:54: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness strtod.c:194: warning: declaration of 'exp' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/bits/mathcalls.h:101: warning: shadowed declaration is here strtod.c:198: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'strtol' differ in signedness strtod.c:216: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness make[3]: *** [strtod.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/build/coreutils/build-i686-gnu-linux-format/build/project/lib' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/build/coreutils/build-i686-gnu-linux-format/build/project/lib' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
