Paul Eggert wrote: > For example, one could build a program that uses gcc's libiberty along > with some gnulib code. The libiberty code won't use Gnulib's > <alloca.h> substitute, but that's OK; it will still work just as well > as it does now. > > So I still don't see the downside of making that change.
Ok, if you don't think there are negative side effects of the change, I don't want to stand in your way. I only mentioned an alternative change that could potentially have less negative side effects. But if there are no downsides anyway, your change is preferable. Bruno
