Jay Levitt wrote: > The top-level config.log says: > > configure:4830: checking for fseeko > configure:4881: result: no > ... > gl_cv_func_fseeko=no > GNULIB_FSEEKO='1' > HAVE_FSEEKO='0' > REPLACE_FSEEKO='1' > > The generated config.h says: > > #define HAVE_FSEEKO 1
Hmm. So the "checking for fseeko" (from fseeko.m4 or fflush.m4) says that fseeko is absent, but AC_FUNC_FSEEKO says that fseeko exists?! Can you show more details from config.log, - from the "checking for fseeko" check, - from the "checking for _LARGEFILE_SOURCE value needed for large files" check? And does your system have fseeko? (What do the includes files say? And the manual pages?) > So now I'm confused, and I'm not sure exactly how it's *supposed* to > work - I don't have another system that's missing fseeko. rpl_fseeko is a wrapper around fseeko. On systems which don't have fseeko, these lines in lib/fseeko.c take effect: #if !HAVE_FSEEKO # undef fseek # define fseeko fseek #endif i.e. rpl_fseeko becomes a wrapper around fseek. Systems which don't have fseeko are OSF/1 4.0, Solaris 2.5.1, mingw. On at least two of these, the gnulib fseeko module is known to work. Bruno
