Re: LIBOBJS warning in documentation no longer required?

[Benoit SIGOURE]

On Oct 15, 2007, at 3:52 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:

Colin Watson wrote:

Should this paragraph be removed from the documentation, and perhaps be

replaced

Yes, this is old doc. I'm replacing it like this:

2007-10-15  Bruno Haible  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        * doc/gnulib-tool.texi (Initial import): Swap order of -I directives.
        Replace paragraph talking about LIBOBJS.
        Reported by Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

*** doc/gnulib-tool.texi.orig   2007-10-15 15:50:18.000000000 +0200
--- doc/gnulib-tool.texi        2007-10-15 15:48:29.000000000 +0200
***************
*** 239,253 ****

[...]

--- 239,252 ----
  @samp{_GNU_SOURCE} may be ineffective, or may have only a limited
  effect, if defined after the first system header file is included.

! Finally, note that you can not use @code{AC_LIBOBJ} or
! @code{AC_REPLACE_FUNCS} in your @file{configure.ac} and expect the

! @code{@@LTLIBOBJS@@} if using Libtool), whereas @file{lib/libgnu.a}
! is build from the contents of a different variable, usually

! resulting object files to be automatically added to @file{lib/ libgnu.a}. ! This is because your @code{AC_LIBOBJ} and @code{AC_REPLACE_FUNCS} invocations ! from @file{configure.ac} augment a variable @code{@@LIBOBJS@@} (and/or

s/build/built/

! @code{@@gl_LIBOBJS@@} (or @code{@@gl_LTLIBOBJS@@} is using Libtool).


  @node Modified imports

Cheers,

--
Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna
EPITA Research and Development Laboratory

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part