Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benoit SIGOURE wrote: >> > 4) Don't use 0 to designate null pointers. That doesn't sit well with >> > C++ compilers. >> >> s/C++/C/ right? > > Actually, neither C nor C++ compilers cry when you use 0 for NULL. It's only > my personal preference.
I prefer to use NULL, too. I've used sparse to help enforce the policy, but not recently: http://git.kernel.org/?p=devel/sparse/sparse.git;a=summary
