Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > According to Simon Josefsson on 4/3/2007 4:22 AM: >> "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>> Please either, indent patches so that gpg doesn't escape leading '-' >>> signs, or use S/MIME for attaching as separate gpg signature. >> >> I think you meant PGP/MIME (RFC3156), S/MIME doesn't use PGP at all, >> but yes, I agree with the suggestion. >> >> Inline PGP signature have several problems (see >> <http://josefsson.org/inline-openpgp-considered-harmful.html>). >> >> /Simon >> > > I tried PGP/MIME with my most recent patch attachment [1], but Thunderbird > enigmail reported a corrupted message. Does anyone have tips on what to > do to get PGP/MIME signatures working reliably? > > [1]http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2007-04/msg00229.html
My MUA said the signature on that message was corrupt too, although your signature on this message was fine. It is possible that a transit MTA, or the mailing list software, corrupted the signature or altered the attachment, although this is rare. Maybe you could try sending the same message, with the same patch, directly to me? If that works, I should be able to see what the difference is, and possibly also guess what causes it. /Simon
