Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > cygwin currently defines wint_t as unsigned int (legal per POSIX), but then > tries to use INT_MIN and INT_MAX for WINT_MIN and WINT_MAX. I've reported > this > as a bug to the cygwin list. In the meantime, is it worth fixing the stdint > module to detect this brokenness, and redefine WINT_MIN and MAX to their > correct values in this case?
If Cygwin fixes it quickly (and why wouldn't they?) then I wouldn't bother, but I don't use Cygwin so I'm probably not the best person to ask.
