The test in test-stdint.c that verifies that INTMAX_MIN is nonzero when
tested as a preprocessor expression fails with SunPRO C 5.0. This works
around it, by replacing the expression
(~ 9223372036854775807LL)
with
((-1LL) << 63)
2007-03-11 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lib/stdint_.h (INT64_MIN, INTMAX_MIN): Avoid using the ~INT..._MAX
formula. Needed for SunPRO C 5.0.
*** lib/stdint_.h 10 Mar 2007 15:03:27 -0000 1.39
--- lib/stdint_.h 12 Mar 2007 02:58:48 -0000
***************
*** 277,283 ****
#undef INT64_MIN
#undef INT64_MAX
#ifdef GL_INT64_T
! # define INT64_MIN (~ INT64_MAX)
# define INT64_MAX INTMAX_C (9223372036854775807)
#endif
--- 277,285 ----
#undef INT64_MIN
#undef INT64_MAX
#ifdef GL_INT64_T
! /* Prefer (- INTMAX_C (1) << 63) over (~ INT64_MAX) because SunPRO C 5.0
! evaluates the latter incorrectly in preprocessor expressions. */
! # define INT64_MIN (- INTMAX_C (1) << 63)
# define INT64_MAX INTMAX_C (9223372036854775807)
#endif
***************
*** 377,386 ****
#undef INTMAX_MIN
#undef INTMAX_MAX
- #define INTMAX_MIN (~ INTMAX_MAX)
#ifdef INT64_MAX
# define INTMAX_MAX INT64_MAX
#else
# define INTMAX_MAX INT32_MAX
#endif
--- 379,389 ----
#undef INTMAX_MIN
#undef INTMAX_MAX
#ifdef INT64_MAX
+ # define INTMAX_MIN INT64_MIN
# define INTMAX_MAX INT64_MAX
#else
+ # define INTMAX_MIN INT32_MIN
# define INTMAX_MAX INT32_MAX
#endif
