On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 02:50:41AM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > ============================ m4/vsnprintf-posix.m4 =========================== > # vsnprintf-posix.m4 serial 1 > dnl Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > dnl This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation > dnl gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it, > dnl with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved. > > AC_DEFUN([gl_FUNC_VSNPRINTF_POSIX], > [ > AC_REQUIRE([gl_EOVERFLOW]) > AC_REQUIRE([gl_PRINTF_SIZES_C99]) > AC_REQUIRE([gl_PRINTF_DIRECTIVE_A]) > AC_REQUIRE([gl_PRINTF_DIRECTIVE_N]) > AC_REQUIRE([gl_PRINTF_POSITIONS]) > gl_cv_func_vsnprintf_posix=no > AC_CHECK_FUNCS([vsnprintf]) > if test $ac_cv_func_vsnprintf = yes; then > dnl Assume that if vsnprintf() exists, snprintf() also exists. > gl_SNPRINTF_TRUNCATION_C99 > gl_SNPRINTF_RETVAL_C99 > gl_SNPRINTF_DIRECTIVE_N > if expr "$gl_cv_func_printf_sizes_c99" : ".*yes" > /dev/null \ > && expr "$gl_cv_func_printf_directive_a" : ".*yes" > /dev/null \ > && expr "$gl_cv_func_printf_directive_n" : ".*yes" > /dev/null \ > && expr "$gl_cv_func_printf_positions" : ".*yes" > /dev/null \ > && expr "$gl_cv_func_snprintf_truncation_c99" : ".*yes" > /dev/null \ > && expr "$gl_cv_func_snprintf_retval_c99" : ".*yes" > /dev/null \ > && expr "$gl_cv_func_snprintf_directive_n" : ".*yes" > /dev/null; then > # vsnprintf exists and is already POSIX compliant. > gl_cv_func_vsnprintf_posix=yes > fi > fi > if test $gl_cv_func_vsnprintf_posix = no; then > if ! expr "$gl_cv_func_printf_directive_a" : ".*yes" > /dev/null; then > AC_DEFINE([NEED_PRINTF_DIRECTIVE_A], 1, > [Define if the vasnprintf implementation needs special code for > the 'a' and 'A' directives.]) > fi > gl_REPLACE_VASNPRINTF > gl_REPLACE_VSNPRINTF > fi > ])
Does gl_cv_func_vsnprintf_posix=yes on AIX 5.1, and Solaris 6-9/SPARC? http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2007-02/msg00224.html -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
