Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Pfaff wrote: >> Here is my attempt at a minimally invasive resolution of the >> differences > > This is backwards. You introduce a dependency from a simple module to a > complicated module. The purpose of 'filename' (ex-'pathname') is to do > the most simple filename manipulations: analysis and concatenation. Why > should it depend on a module that defines functions base_name(), dir_name(), > last_component(), strip_trailing_slashes() ?
It's not clear to me that concatenation is much simpler than extraction, but now I can use both headers at once, which is what I wanted. Thanks Bruno! -- Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://benpfaff.org
