Eric Blake wrote: > > Here is a proposed patch, that leads to a link error if someone > > uses stpcpy() without the 'stpcpy' module (assuming the 'string' module > > is present - which is quite likely since so much depends on it). > > Sounds like a great idea to me.
OK, thanks for this opinion. There were also no objections, so I apply the patch. > I guess the alternative would be making stpcpy.c part of the string module, > and removing the stpcpy module altogether Many people would frown upon the lots of code added to their package without apparent reason. So this option is IMO not viable. Bruno
