Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would propose: ... > - euidaccess: change group-member.c so that it doesn't use xmalloc. If the > memory allocation fails, let group_member() return -1 with errno = ENOMEM. > Jim, would you accept patches to that effect?
Sure. > - fts-lgpl & openat: no opinion. Jim, Paul? Separating the LGPL and GPL'd parts of fts is no small task. I'm not even going to think about this right now. I've invested enough time in it recently, making it work correctly and efficiently. Openat emulation is similar. I think relaxing a GPL license to LGPL for any significant module should be done only if there is a very good reason. With these two modules (and all of their many dependents), I'm reluctant to switch just so that LGPL-restricted projects can use them. Perhaps the people who care about the distinction will investigate and propose a patch or two. But be warned: it might not even be feasible to complete the split cleanly. > - getaddrinfo, inttostr: Paul, can you agree to put intprops under LGPL? Maybe someone will contribute a dumbed-down LGPL-able version that is "good enough". > - glob: d-type has no source code in lib/, therefore whether it has a GPL > or LGPL license statement does not matter. Jim? Ok. I've switched it to LGPL.
