Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can you agree to that, Paul? I know you worked several hours on this patch, > but if we carry it forward, it will cost many more hours of brain cycles in > other code, like gnulib, coreutils etc. - for the sole purpose of unoptimized > binaries on one particular version of a rare OS.
I have no problem with that. The patch is there, in case the problem comes up on other platforms, and we can start from it as needed.
