Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The reason is that HAVE_SETLOCALE is tested, but nowhere defined. Since one > can assume setlocale() already for ca. 5 years, there is no risk in removing > the HAVE_SETLOCALE. Here is a proposed patch.
I'm still testing for setlocale in libidn. Why can we assume setlocale exists? Is it POSIX? Or is there some mechanism that turn the call to setlocale into a null-op if the system doesn't have it? /Simon
