Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> + /* Set of currently blocked and pending signals. */
> + static volatile char pending_array[NSIG] /* = { 0 } */;
Surely this should be sig_atomic_t rather than char?
> + int
> + sigfillset (sigset_t *set)
> + {
> + *set = -2U << (NSIG - 1);
This doesn't look right to me, as it clears the set.
I'm not a Windows expert, so I'm not sure how well the race conditions
will work out, but I assume that is a known issue.
