Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does this need to go by RMS, and if yes, is there > somebody to do this for me, after this has been improved to a phrasing > that finds consensus?
As mentioned in standards.texi please send a "diff -c" patch to <bug-standards@gnu.org>; it'll eventually go by RMS. The patch (as revised) looks good to me.
