-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Ben Pfaff on 7/26/2006 11:54 AM:
> Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
>> According to Ben Pfaff on 7/25/2006 11:21 AM:
>>> Can you expand on why tmpfile is not so safe?
>> I'd still like to fear Paul's reasons.  
> 
> I hope you mean "hear" them :-)
A rather humorous typo on my part, in retrospect.  Sorry for the confusion.

> I was worried that there was something bigger here.  Usually a
> "safety" issue is something more important than leaving a
> temporary file undeleted or limiting their number, like the
> possibility of a security hole, a segfault, etc.

Not that I'm aware of.

- --
Life is short - so eat dessert first!

Eric Blake             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEyDYR84KuGfSFAYARAmHMAJ9kOuKOUGzEB+E/l1yvDHIfyzwxxgCgrhL9
MGygCbDuGK3K0qOncwyxqpo=
=ezWw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply via email to