* Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:20:58AM CEST: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What about realloc (NULL, ...)? > > In practice that is as portable as free (NULL). They were > standardized at the same time.
Well, with the difference being here that realloc, similar to malloc, may not do what you expect from its glibc implementations, i.e., return non-NULL upon a request of zero size (which is the main reason for the Gnulib realloc module). Cheers, Ralf
