Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > Wouldn't this be a good situation to have nanosleep depend on the > unistd module, and make the replacement unistd.h include winsock2.h on > mingw32 platforms? After all, nanosleep.c include unistd.h, and > unistd.h define select on some platforms.
Yes, I'd prefer that. Did you (Simon) just volunteer? :)
