Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about changing the License of the csharpcomp-script module to > "helper-GPL", and make "helper-GPL" LGPL-compatible, as far as > gnulib-tool is concerned?
To clarify: gnulib-tool should NOT alter the GPL license template in csharpcomp.sh.in here. I feel the script should stay GPL. My point is to make it possible to use the script to build LGPL material. I also note that this is another situation where the AC_LIBSOURCES approach appear to cause pains. If AC_LIBSOURCES was not used, it would be simpler to have multiple gnulib-tool "instances" in the same project, without having to write a configure.ac for each directory. _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
