-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is there a preference for 'const char *' over 'char const *'? A quick grep of my locally-modified gnulib repository shows 208 "char const *" vs. 793 "const char *" in the .c and .h files. The GNU Coding Standards offer no help - http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#CPU-Portability has exactly one example apiece of the two styles (one of which is gnulib's error module). POSIX 1003.1 2004 edition XSH exclusively uses 'const char', and I tend to prefer it as well. Should this be clarified in the coding standards?
- -- Life is short - so eat dessert first! Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDfV4m84KuGfSFAYARApM+AKCNPB0SesE3sBmOHj8ff35jy+UFQwCg1Kw4 AVaPzoAoVd5fUAfoNfI5u4s= =26fG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
