Eric Blake writes: > > But C89 does not have long long - what does the standard say about > literals that exceed long?
They have type unsigned long. (Similarly, C99 says that unsuffixed decimal literals that are too big to fit in long long have type unsigned long long.) -Larry Jones I don't want to be THIS good! -- Calvin _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
