Jim Meyering wrote: >I like your idea of keeping them separate. >How about passing either NULL or the address of a struct >containing a member for each error indicator? > >
Okay. Will do. Should I ignore single-threaded apps entirely, keep the error data in a global to simplify for single-threaded apps on NULL, or break the functions into canon_host, canon_host_r, strcherror, & strcherror_r? Regards, Derek -- Derek R. Price CVS Solutions Architect Ximbiot <http://ximbiot.com> v: +1 717.579.6168 f: +1 717.234.3125 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
