Hello,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 10:53:45AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> All of this is hypothetical though, since it doesn't look like adding
> the readline library as a gnulib module will happen now.
Why not? I don't see any reason against the "readline stub" module
you proposed.
Bruno pointed out problems with "full readline" module, and asked:
> > rl_add_defun etc.). Do you want to provide all these symbols?
Your answer was no.
So with your module, the application would have:
1) readline() function
2) #if READLINE
I guess it might be worth it. Opinions?
Have a nice day,
Stepan
_______________________________________________
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
