On Sun, 8 Sept 2024 at 09:42, martin rudalics <rudal...@gmx.at> wrote:
> >> -#if defined (USE_X_TOOLKIT) || defined (USE_GTK) > >> +#if defined (USE_X_TOOLKIT) && !defined (USE_GTK) > >> > > > > OK, so I applied this patch and ran `emacs -Q`, then did C-x 5 2 and got > > the usual small window and error: > > > > (emacs:3159980): Gtk-CRITICAL **: 13:05:49.056: > > gtk_distribute_natural_allocation: assertion 'extra_space >= 0' failed > > Do you get an assertion failure already before the C-x 5 2? > No. Where could we go from here? > (I comment below where I think I may have useful input.) after requesting the larger size. For this purpose we would have to > find out whether 400x340 is some built-in size used by the WM or GTK > or something Emacs itself has used before. > Since this size crops up with emacs -Q, it doesn't seem to be related to something Emacs has used before. I did also grep through my ~/.emacs.d directory, but I couldn't find anything relevant there. (4) Look for other causes. Could scaling be involved? My GNOME desktop is scaled by 200%, so it could be. > (5) Finally, the most important: Can other users observe the same or > similar behavior as Reuben? > Several bugs were already reported of similar behaviour, no? Or maybe you meant something more specific. -- https://rrt.sc3d.org
