Philip Kaludercic <phil...@posteo.net> writes: [...]
>> diff --git a/lisp/dired-aux.el b/lisp/dired-aux.el >> index cd948bd7dd9..97b1e28a4ff 100644 >> --- a/lisp/dired-aux.el >> +++ b/lisp/dired-aux.el >> @@ -1472,7 +1472,7 @@ dired-do-open >> (when command >> (dolist (file files) >> (cond >> - ((memq system-type '(gnu/linux)) >> + ((memq system-type '(gnu/linux berkeley-unix)) > > Are these the only systems with xdg-open? I don't really know. I guess that FreeBSD and NetBSD also have ports of xdg-open. But I don't know for others "berkeley-unix". Anyway, this is less restrictive than just "gnu/linux". > And is xdg-open reliably available on BSD systems, so that we don't > generate an opaque error message if that is not the case? I think it would work whether xdg-open is install or not because `shell-command-guess-open' is defined by testing the presence of xdg-open. So if xdg-open is not installed, `command' in the code above will be nil and nothing will happen. -- Manuel Giraud
