On 12/09/2024 18:06, Bruno Haible wrote:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
I'll apply the attached sometime tomorrow.
Nice! Thank you.
There seems to be a typo in the unit test, though: It defines a shell
function 'printf_checki_err' but the function it then invokes is
'printf_check_err'.
Hah, good catch.
That hid other errors in the test.
Fixed up with the attached.
thanks for the review,
Pádraig
diff --git a/tests/printf/printf-indexed.sh b/tests/printf/printf-indexed.sh
index 1c3a6c380..d0f799ab1 100755
--- a/tests/printf/printf-indexed.sh
+++ b/tests/printf/printf-indexed.sh
@@ -34,14 +34,14 @@ EOF
compare exp out || fail=1
}
-printf_checki_err() {
+printf_check_err() {
cat <<EOF > exp || framework_failure_
$1
EOF
shift
- returns_1 $prog "$@" 2> out || fail=1
+ returns_ 1 $prog "$@" 2> out || fail=1
compare exp out || fail=1
}
@@ -85,9 +85,9 @@ printf_check_err 'printf: %-2$: invalid conversion specification' \
# Ensure only base 10 numbers are accepted
printf_check_err "printf: 'A': expected a numeric value" \
- '%0x2$s %1$s\n' A B
+ '%0x2$s %2$s\n' A B
# Verify int limits (avoiding comparisons with argc etc.)
-printf_check_err "printf: %${INT_OFLOW}$: invalid conversion specification" \
- "%${INT_OFLOW}$d\n" 1
+printf_check_err "printf: %${INT_OFLOW}\$: invalid conversion specification" \
+ "%${INT_OFLOW}\$d\n" 1
Exit $fail