Hello,
In the info page of ‘shred’, the wording ‘Although this is
common ..., but many’ is not right.
From: =?UTF-8?q?=C3=81lvar=20Ibeas?= <a.ib...@gmx.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 22:43:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] doc: shred: minor fix
* doc/coreutils.texi
---
doc/coreutils.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/coreutils.texi b/doc/coreutils.texi
index 2af761654..e6eae44dc 100644
--- a/doc/coreutils.texi
+++ b/doc/coreutils.texi
@@ -10297,7 +10297,7 @@ with non-sensitive data.
@strong{Please note} that @command{shred} relies on a crucial
assumption: that the file system and hardware overwrite data in place.
Although this is common and is the traditional
-way to do things, but many modern file system designs do not satisfy this
+way to do things, many modern file system designs do not satisfy this
assumption. Exceptions include:
@itemize @bullet
--
2.30.2
