On Mon, Apr 25, 2022, at 13:06, Paul Eggert wrote: > > I'd like coreutils printf to stay compatible with Bash printf. Thanks. > Is there any interest/motivation for consistentizing {coreutils printf, bash printf} with glibc printf? There's a minor but notable inconsistency between them for %a format. See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2022-04/msg00020.html I asked about this on the coreutils list, but no response. Thanks, Glenn
- bug#54785: for floating point, printf should use double li... Vincent Lefevre
- bug#54785: for floating point, printf should use doub... Paul Eggert
- bug#54785: for floating point, printf should use ... Chet Ramey
- bug#54785: for floating point, printf should ... Vincent Lefevre
- bug#54785: for floating point, printf should ... Paul Eggert
- bug#54785: for floating point, printf sho... Chet Ramey
- bug#54785: for floating point, print... Paul Eggert
- bug#54785: for floating point, p... Glenn Golden
- bug#54785: for floating poin... Paul Eggert
- bug#54785: for floating poin... Glenn Golden
- bug#54785: for floating poin... Paul Eggert
- bug#54785: for floating poin... Andreas Schwab
- bug#54785: for floating point, p... Chet Ramey
- bug#54785: for floating poin... Paul Eggert
- bug#54785: for floating poin... Vincent Lefevre
- bug#54785: for floating poin... Paul Eggert