On Friday, January 18, 2019 8:26:18 AM CET Assaf Gordon wrote: > Hello, > > On 2018-12-06 6:32 a.m., Kamil Dudka wrote: > > Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1527391 > > --- > > > > doc/coreutils.texi | 8 +++++--- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/doc/coreutils.texi b/doc/coreutils.texi > > index f8339d73f..e93fe71a0 100644 > > --- a/doc/coreutils.texi > > +++ b/doc/coreutils.texi > > @@ -7975,9 +7975,11 @@ Append @samp{*} for executable regular files, > > otherwise behave as for> > > @opindex --kibibytes > > Set the default block size to its normal value of 1024 bytes, > > overriding any contrary specification in environment variables > > > > -(@pxref{Block size}). This option is in turn overridden by the > > -@option{--block-size}, @option{-h} or @option{--human-readable}, and > > -@option{--si} options. > > +(@pxref{Block size}). If @option{--block-size}, @option{-h}, > > +@option{--human-readable}, or @option{--si} options are used, > > +they take precedence over @option{-k} or @option{--kibibytes} > > +even if @option{-k} or @option{--kibibytes} is placed after > > +the other options. > > > > The @option{-k} or @option{--kibibytes} option affects the > > per-directory block count written by the @option{-l} and similar > > I'm ok with this improvement - if there are no comments > I'll push in the next few days. > > -assaf
I can see no more comments on this. Could you please proceed to push it? Kamil
