tags 33785 notabug
close 33785
stop
Hello,
On 2018-12-19 10:05 a.m., Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 17/12/18 22:42, lzhong wrote:
According to the following commit
commit 2e81e62243409c5c574b899f52b08c000e4d99fd
df: only suppress remote mounts of separate exports with --total
[...]
The remote mounts should not be suppressed after this change. However,
it turns out
it doesn't work as the message described. The remote mounts are still
suppressed. And here is
The intent of the patch was not to suppress _separate_ exports on the server.
I.E. nas.example.com:/Photos and nas.example.com:/Download would not
be suppressed (even if they have the same device id).
If you want all nfs mounts you could `df -a -t nfs`
With no further comments, I'm closing this as "notabug".
Discussion can continue by replying to this thread.
-assaf