On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:59:20 +0100 Pádraig Brady <p...@draigbrady.com> wrote:
> So I reinstated the bit vector which was a little tricky > to do while maintaining performance, but it works very well. I think it works because we are avoiding a memory access inside `next_item' this way. With this patch I try to keep the CPU benefits for `--output-d' and when large ranges are specified, even without the bitarray. Because of the sentinel now the max line len supported will be `(size_t)-1 - 1' and no more `(size_t)-1'. Is this an issue? PS: This patch also fix a little bug inside `set_fields'. Best regards, Cojocaru Alexandru
cut.patch
Description: Binary data
