On 04/11/13 11:17, r...@electronicstheory.com wrote: > Is there > some reason it can't give me what (it appears) the manual says (and what makes > sense) it should?
Sounds like there's a bug in the manual; it shouldn't say that "ls -d" outputs only directories. Can you please mention the wording you're talking about? To get something like what you want, you can use this command: ls -d */ or maybe: ls -d */ .*/
