Pádraig Brady wrote: > > - && chmod -w $@-t \ > > + && chmod a-w $@-t \ > > I'll apply that fix.
I think it is always a good idea to use 'a' when there isn't any other specific reason to do anything different. Or put the reverse way, whenever I see a naken "-[rwx]" then I am suspicious of the action. Because it masks with umask and is almost never what is desired. > What system does the build fail on as a matter of interest. This will occur on any system that has umask set to 022. Here is an example: $ umask 022 $ touch foo $ chmod ug+w foo $ chmod -w foo chmod: foo: new permissions are r--rw-r--, not r--r--r-- $ echo $? 1 Bob
