Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/12/2012 04:51 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
I hope to prove the subject convincingly in the following sections, If
you can, reading this in the original HTML might be useful, as I don't
know it will end up when converted to text.
the mail engines sripped it to
plain text before it ever hit the list or the online bug report:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12339#239
----
Doesn't look like it. I sent it in plain and HTML, and it
displays the plaintext as formatted by Thunderbird, by default, and
has a link to the second part where it has stored the original.
Seems your db-bug report engine is smarter than you give it
credit for -- that and my deliberately including a plaintext version
that would try to represent the formatting as closely as possible.
So please bear with me if my inability to see your intended markup means
that I misinterpret your intent.
---
If you want to see the html copy, it kept it at:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?msg=239;att=1;bug=12339.
