Linda Walsh wrote:
...
Do you have reason to believe they have buggy code by default?
I'll Cc' the coreutils bug-list on this and
>> open a bug-report << on this
as should have been done originally,
and maybe your questions can be addressed.
Hi Linda,
Do you realize that by merely sending a message to bug-coreutils,
you have created an entry in our bug-tracking software?
----
Did you read the above?
*Ahem*. "Do you realize that merely by closing out the bug and not
addressing the issue you defeated the whole point of reporting
a downstream distributor's concern"?
I won't bother to play re-open the bug -- as my guess if you
can't get it from my original post was that it was fixed, but
as I coudln't address his concerns, I felt it needed to be
addessed from upstream -- thus the bug report. I don't think
closing it out without addressing the downstream integrator's
concern (openSuSE), is the clearest response that one might
make.
