On 01/09/12 17:41, Linda Walsh wrote: > Wouldn't it be appropriate, to keep such a bug at a low priority
Perhaps; I don't know. Its priority is so low here that I'd rather not spend time thinking about whether it belongs in the bug database. For more on the topic of priorities please see <http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/System-Portability.html>. My suggestion was meant to be a helpful one, in that it proposed a course of action that's far more likely to get the bug fixed. Surely that's the main point here.
