tags 8676 + notabug thanks Paul Eggert wrote: > On 05/16/11 01:48, Peggy Russell wrote: >> Shouldn't the `ls -l --si` output (#2 or #4) be display as 60MB vs 60M > > That would be more consistent, yes. But it would also take up an extra > column of output, and those columns are precious.
Just marking this issue as "done".
