On 29/05/11 01:28, Ola Olsson wrote: > <[email protected]>According to valgrind, ls -l leaks memory. I have > included the "coreutils version", "uname -a" information, Expected output > from valgrind ("ls") and non-expected output ("ls -l").
ls does leak but inconsequentially. Explicitly freeing the memory would only waste time managing the heap just before we'd exit anyway. cheers, Pádraig.
