On 05/03/11 08:17, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 03/04/2011 07:29 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: >> we should use a better overall solution for partial >> reads; I'll try to come up with one. > > Here is a proposed change for that, incorporating > the recent suggestions plus a couple more ideas:
OK I like this since it consolidates the code. It's slightly less general in that it would erroneously warn with conv=sync oflag=direct, but that's not a practical concern. So Ack. cheers, Pádraig.
