On 30/05/10 01:15, Ángel González wrote: > I wanted to keep the original exit status of the command run by > timeout(3), even after sending a timeout signal. > Thus I added a --exit-status parameter to it. Here it is in case you > find that useful, too.
Thanks very much for the patch. At first thought it seems like a very unusual use case. Can you describe your use in a bit more detail to help us determine if this is generally useful. cheers, Pádraig.
