According to Eric Blake on 2/25/2010 8:41 AM: > According to Eric Blake on 2/18/2010 7:18 AM: >> According to jida...@jidanni.org on 2/18/2010 6:54 AM: >>> EB> jidanni, it would be a two-line patch to expr.c. Would you care to >>> write >>> EB> such a patch, rather than just complaining? >>> >>> It would be much more efficient for me to just play the role of the bug >>> reporter here.... trust me. Thanks. >> >> You are giving up too easily. Your bug reports would go a LOT further if >> you would show some effort behind them. > > Your suggestion wasn't all that bad, but I still stand by my position that > you should do more work than just complain. But I had some time available > while cleaning out my inbox, and I was feeling generous, so I finished the > work and am pushing this:
After first squashing in this, to pass 'make check' again.
diff --git a/tests/misc/expr b/tests/misc/expr
index 10dd1c5..6c4280f 100755
--- a/tests/misc/expr
+++ b/tests/misc/expr
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ my @Tests =
# This erroneously succeeded and output `3' before 2.0.12.
- ['fail-a', '3 + -', {ERR => "$prog: non-numeric argument\n"},
+ ['fail-a', '3 + -', {ERR => "$prog: non-integer argument\n"},
{EXIT => 2}],
# This erroneously succeeded before 5.3.1.
--
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake e...@byu.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
