Follow-up Comment #1, bug #28492 (project coreutils):
Thanks for the report (although the mailing list tends to be the preferred
medium for potential patches). You are indeed correct that this is a
violation of POSIX.
Your patch is reversed in sense (you want the original file to be listed
first, not second). Also, your attempt at an electronic copyright disclaimer
does not hold enough weight to work with the FSF; fortunately, though, your
contribution is small enough to not need copyright assignment in the first
place.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?28492>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
