Thanks Kamil, yes, CHAR_MAX + 1 looks like a better choice. Are there other comments?
Giuseppe Kamil Dudka <kdu...@redhat.com> writes: > Hello Giuseppe, > > On Tue August 18 2009 12:47:06 Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: >> diff --git a/src/nl.c b/src/nl.c >> index 2deb314..ea7ebe6 100644 >> --- a/src/nl.c >> +++ b/src/nl.c >> @@ -150,7 +150,9 @@ static struct option const longopts[] = >> {"body-numbering", required_argument, NULL, 'b'}, >> {"footer-numbering", required_argument, NULL, 'f'}, >> {"starting-line-number", required_argument, NULL, 'v'}, >> - {"page-increment", required_argument, NULL, 'i'}, >> + {"line-increment", required_argument, NULL, 'i'}, >> + /* FIXME: page-increment is deprecated, remove in dec-2011. */ >> + {"page-increment", required_argument, NULL, 'I'}, > > what about use of CHAR_MAX + 1 instead of 'I'? > > Kamil